![]() The way too early mocks knew that Georgia defensive lineman Jalen Carter had top-10 pick talent, that Texas’s Bijan Robinson would be the best running back in the draft, and that Northwestern tackle Peter Skoronski would be one of the top offensive linemen. Our mocks are locks.īut it’s not just those three 360 or so days ago, analysts were pretty dead-on about many of the other top prospects in this year’s class. With just a day until the draft, the exact order is far from guaranteed, but we know that those three will be toward the top because basically nothing about the 2022 college football season significantly altered their draft stock. The Ringer’s 2023 NFL Draft Guide lists Anderson, Young, and Stroud as its top three players. Even after the full 2022 college football season, the NFL scouting combine, and the monthslong predraft process, nobody has replaced them as the top three prospects in the draft. When you go through last year’s way too early mocks, basically every publication identified three likely top picks: Alabama quarterback Bryce Young, the 2021 Heisman winner Alabama linebacker Will Anderson Jr. “These are often inaccurate exercises, at best,” wrote USA Today’s Mark Schofield.īut there was no need for hedging in the 2023 draft cycle. … Expect big changes between now and next April,” wrote ESPN’s Todd McShay in his way too early mock from May 5 of last year. “Now, this is an extremely early prediction. Almost every publication that drops a way too early mock draft in May uses similar self-deprecating phrasing, and writers hedge throughout each piece. When the NFL draft ends and draft analysts need to justify their professional existence, they often produce a piece of content that even they admit is kind of a gag-the way too early mock draft, a projection of next year’s draft, sometimes published mere hours after the current draft ends.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |